French college of gynecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF) recommendations for clinical practice: Place of breast self-examination in screening strategies.

Breast cancer is the most common female cancer in the world. Numerous studies have shown that the risk of metastatic disease increases with tumor volume. In this context, it is useful to assess whether the regular practice of formal breast self-examination (BSE) as opposed to breast awareness has an impact on the number of cancers diagnosed, their stage, the treatments used and mortality. DESIGN: The Commission of Senology (CS) of the Collège National de Gynécologie et Obstétrique Français (CNGOF) respected and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. METHODS: The CS studied 16 questions individualizing four groups of women (general population, women aged over 75, high-risk women, and women previously treated for breast cancer). For each situation, it was determined whether the practice of BSE versus abstention from this examination led to detection of more breast cancers and/or recurrences and/or reduced treatment and/or increased survival. RESULTS: BSE should not be recommended for women in the general population, who otherwise benefit from clinical breast examination by practitioners from the age of 25, and from organized screening from 50 to 74 (strong recommendation). In the absence of data on the benefits of BSE in patients aged over 75, for those at high risk and those previously treated for breast cancer, the CS was unable to issue recommendations. Thus, if women in these categories wish to undergo BSE, information on the benefits and risks observed in the general population must be given, notably that BSE is associated with a higher number of referrals, biopsies, and a reduced quality of life.

Vulvar Carcinoma: Standard of Care and Perspectives.

PURPOSE: Treatment of vulvar carcinoma (VC) is challenging. The objectives of this review were to describe for clinicians the epidemiologic and clinical aspects of VC, the standard of care in terms of primary local treatment and systemic therapies, and the recent innovations and perspectives emerging from translational research in immuno-oncology. DESIGN: We conducted a comprehensive review outlying the clinical aspects and biologic background of vulvar cancer, highlighting modern treatment strategies on the basis of a personalized approach. RESULTS: Epidemiologic data showed a recent rise in incidence of VC, attributed to human papillomavirus. Surgery is the mainstay of primary treatment, but multimodal approaches are frequently required in the presence of adverse prognosis histopathologic factors. Chemoradiation is indicated when organ-sparing surgery is not feasible. However, inability to achieve high locoregional control rates in advanced cases and the morbidity associated with local treatments are still key issues. Recent clinical data showed the benefit of individualized strategies combining organ-sparing surgical strategies, less invasive lymph node staging procedures, and refinement in radiotherapy modalities. Among the most important research area, there is a sound rationale for testing modern systemic approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibitors in selected patients with recurrent and/or metastatic tumors. Although no specific data exist for VC, the role of supportive care and post-treatment rehabilitation strategies is also crucial. CONCLUSION: There are still insufficient studies dedicated to patients with VC. Public health programs for prevention, screening, and early diagnosis are required, and clinical research should be strengthened to provide high-quality clinical evidence and improve patients' oncologic and functional outcomes.

[Update of indications and techniques for the management of lymphedema after breast cancer surgery]. / Actualisation des indications et des techniques de prise en charge du lymphœdème après chirurgie du cancer du sein.

OBJECTIVES: Upper limb lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment is the leading cause of lymphedema in France. Despite improved surgical practices and de-escalation of radiotherapy, the risk of lymphedema after breast cancer still affects 5-20% of patients, with this variation depending on the measurement method used and the population studied. Lymphedema has a negative impact on quality of life and body image, and their possible occurrence remains a major concern for all women treated for breast cancer. The Sénologie Commission of the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) asked four specialists in breast surgery or lymphology to prepare a summary on the prevention, medical and surgical management of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment, and to discuss the medical and surgical innovations currently being evaluated. METHODS: This synthesis was based on national and international guidelines on the management of upper limb lymphedema after breast surgery and a recent review of the literature focusing on the years 2020-2023. RESULTS: From a preventive point of view, the restrictive instructions imposed for a long time (reduction in physical activity or the carrying of loads, air travel, exposure to the sun or cold, etc.) have altered patients' quality of life and should no longer be recommended. A good understanding of risk factors enables us to target preventive actions. Examples include obesity, a sedentary lifestyle, axillary clearance, radiotherapy of the axillary fossa in addition to axillary clearance, total mastectomy, taxanes or anti-HER-2 therapies in the adjuvant phase. Resumption of physical activity, minimally invasive axillary surgery, de-escalation of radiotherapy and breast-conserving surgical procedures have all demonstrated their preventive value. When lymphedema does occur, early management, through complete decongestive physiotherapy, can help reduce its volume and prevent its long-term worsening. CONCLUSION: Surgical (lymph node transplants, lympho-vascular anastomoses) and medical (prolymphangiogenic growth factors) approaches to lymphedema treatment are numerous, but require long-term evaluation of their efficacy and adverse effects.

[Updated surgical indications and quality and safety indicators in the management of infiltrative breast carcinoma]. / Actualisation des indications chirurgicales et des indicateurs de qualité et sécurité des soins dans la prise en charge des carcinomes mammaires invasifs.

OBJECTIVES: Breast surgery is the cornerstone of breast cancer treatment. Its indications and procedures are constantly evolving. To update best practices, four questions were submitted to the Senology Commission (SC) of the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF), covering the indications and modalities of tumor surgery: (1) initially, (2) following neoadjuvant systemic treatment, (3) in case of local recurrence, and (4) the quality and safety of care indicators applicable to this surgery. METHODS: The CNGOF SC essentially based its responses on the clinical practice recommendations and guidelines of the French Cancer Institute concerning invasive carcinomas of the breast. Exclusion criteria were carcinoma in situ, sarcoma and axillary surgery. RESULTS: To define the type of breast surgery, knowledge of four parameters is essential: the patient's level of risk, the presence of metastases, the size of the breast tumor and its focality (assessed by the clinical/mammography/ultrasound tripod). (1) In the case of initial management, the 6 indications for mastectomy are patient choice (particularly in case of high risk), contraindication to radiotherapy, inflammatory cancer (T4d), surgery with positive margins (after several surgical intervention), surgery that cannot be performed as a monobloc in the case of tumors with multiple foci, and poor expected aesthetic results. All other situations should be treated conservatively. (2) The same criteria apply after neoadjuvant systemic treatment, with conservative treatment still possible whatever the size (excluding carcinomatous mastitis) and focality of the initial tumor. (3) In case of local recurrence, total mastectomy is the reference treatment, with a second conservative treatment reserved for patients with no risk factors for a second recurrence, and no poor prognostic factors, after validation in a multidisciplinary meeting. (4) Four quality and safety indicators apply to breast surgery: it must be performed after obtaining a histological diagnosis, within less than 6 weeks of mammography, in a single surgery in over 80% of cases, and followed by local radiotherapy in the case of conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: The indications and modalities of breast surgery are evolving rapidly. To improve aesthetic results, oncoplastic techniques, immediate breast reconstruction, and preservation of the skin or nipple-areolar complex need to be further developed and evaluated in the long-term. These developments must necessarily be accompanied in France by a training policy for breast surgeons.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical presentation, treatments, and outcomes of new breast cancer patients: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The SARS CoV-2 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems. We compared the cancer stage for new breast cancers (BCs) before and during the pandemic. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study on the data warehouse of Greater Paris University Hospitals (AP-HP). We identified all female patients newly referred with a BC in 2019 and 2020. We assessed the timeline of their care trajectories, initial tumor stage, and treatment received: BC resection, exclusive systemic therapy, exclusive radiation therapy, or exclusive best supportive care (BSC). We calculated patients' 1-year overall survival (OS) and compared indicators in 2019 and 2020. RESULTS: In 2019 and 2020, 2055 and 1988, new BC patients underwent cancer treatment, and during the two lockdowns, the BC diagnoses varied by -18% and by +23% compared to 2019. De novo metastatic tumors (15% and 15%, p = 0.95), pTNM and ypTNM distributions of 1332 cases with upfront resection and of 296 cases with neoadjuvant therapy did not differ (p = 0.37, p = 0.3). The median times from first multidisciplinary meeting and from diagnosis to treatment of 19 days (interquartile 11-39 days) and 35 days (interquartile 22-65 days) did not differ. Access to plastic surgery (15% and 17%, p = 0.08) and to treatment categories did not vary: tumor resection (73% and 72%), exclusive systemic therapy (13% and 14%), exclusive radiation therapy (9% and 9%), exclusive BSC (5% and 5%) (p = 0.8). Among resected patients, the neoadjuvant therapy rate was lower in 2019 (16%) versus 2020 (20%) (p = 0.02). One-year OS rates were 99.3% versus 98.9% (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77-1.2), 72.6% versus 76.6% (HR = 1.28; 95% CI, 0.95-1.72), 96.6% versus 97.8% (HR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.61-1.94), and 15.5% versus 15.1% (HR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.72-1.37), in the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a decrease in the number of new BCs, there was no tumor stage shift, and OS did not vary.

Robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic, vaginal, and open surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The potential benefits and limitations of benign hysterectomy surgical approaches are still debated. We aimed at evaluating any differences with a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were last searched on 6/2/2021 to identify English randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort and retrospective independent database studies published between Jan 1, 2010 and Dec 31, 2020 reporting perioperative outcomes following robotic hysterectomy versus laparoscopic, open, or vaginal approach (PROSPERO #CRD42022352718). Twenty-four articles were included that reported on 110,306 robotic, 262,715 laparoscopic, 189,237 vaginal, and 554,407 open patients. The robotic approach was associated with a shorter hospital stay (p < 0.00001), less blood loss (p = 0.009), and fewer complications (OR: 0.42 [0.27, 0.66], p = 0.0001) when compared to the open approach. The main benefit compared to the laparoscopic and vaginal approaches was a shorter hospital (R/L WMD: - 0.144 [- 0.21, - 0.08], p < 0.0001; R/V WMD: - 0.39 [- 0.70, - 0.08], p = 0.01). Other benefits seen were sensitive to the inclusion of database studies. Study type differences in outcomes, a lack of RCTs for robotic vs. open comparisons, learning curve issues, and limited robotic vs. vaginal publications are limitations. While the robotic approach was mainly comparable to the laparoscopic approach, this meta-analysis confirms the classic benefits of minimally invasive surgery when comparing robotic hysterectomy to open surgery. We also reported the advantages of robotic surgery over vaginal surgery in a patient population with a higher incidence of large uterus and prior surgery.

Value of high-resolution full-field optical coherence tomography and dynamic cell imaging for one-stop rapid diagnosis breast clinic.

BACKGROUND: Full-field optical coherence tomography combined with dynamic cell imaging (D-FFOCT) is a new, simple-to-use, nondestructive, quick technique that can provide sufficient spatial resolution to mimic histopathological analysis. The objective of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performance of D-FFOCT for one-stop rapid diagnosis breast clinic. METHODS: Dynamic full-field optical coherence tomography was applied to fresh, untreated breast and nodes biopsies. Four different readers (senior and junior radiologist, surgeon, and pathologist) analyzed the samples without knowing final histological diagnosis or American College of Radiology classification. The results were compared to conventional processing and staining (hematoxylin-eosin). RESULTS: A total of 217 biopsies were performed on 152 patients. There were 144 breast biopsies and 61 lymph nodes with 101 infiltrative cancers (49.27%), 99 benign lesions (48.29%), 3 ductal in situ carcinoma (1.46%), and 2 atypias (0.98%). The diagnostic performance results were as follow: sensitivity: 77% [0.7;0.82], specificity: 64% [0.58;0.71], PPV: 74% [0.68;0.78], and NPV: 75% [0.72;0.78]. A large image atlas was created as well as a diagnosis algorithm from the readers' experience. CONCLUSION: With 74% PPV and 75% NPV, D-FFOCT is not yet ready to be used in clinical practice to identify breast cancer. This is mainly explained by the lack of experience and knowledge of this new technic by the four lectors. By training with the diagnosis algorithm and the image atlas, radiologists could have better outcomes allowing quick detection of breast cancer and lymph node involvement. Deep learning could also be used, and further investigation will follow.

Vulvar biopsy: Punch biopsy or cervical forceps biopsy?

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of our study is to investigate the rate of non-contributory biopsies between punch biopsy(PB) and cervical forceps biopsy(CFB) for a vulvar lesion seen in consultation. The secondary objective of our study is to evaluate the rate of underestimation of a more severe lesion for patients who have undergone vulvar excision. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a retrospective, descriptive, and comparative study conducted at three centers. The study population consisted of patients who underwent vulvar biopsy between 2017 and 2022 in a gynecological surgery consultation at two French hospitals, as well as a city office. The biopsy techniques used were punch or cervical forceps biopsy. Quantitative variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, while Pearson's or Fisher's Xi2 tests were used for qualitative variables. The significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective study of 179 vulvar biopsies, of which 100 were punch biopsies and 79 were cervical forceps biopsies, from a total of 107 patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of non-contributory biopsies between the PB and CB groups (p = 1). When analyzing the secondary endpoint of our study, which included 68 patients who underwent vulvectomy after vulvar biopsy, we found that 66 patients (97%) had a good correlation between the pathology of the vulvar biopsy and that of the vulvectomy specimen. CONCLUSION: Vulvar biopsy techniques using punch or cervical forceps appear to have similar diagnostic performance and are associated with comparable and low rates of underestimation of invasive lesions.

[Place of breast self-examination in screening strategies. French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) recommendations for clinical practice]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF. Place de l'auto-examen des seins dans les stratégies de dépistage.

OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer is the most common female cancer in the world. In France, over 60,000 new cases are currently diagnosed, and 12,000 deaths are attributed to it annually. Numerous studies have shown that the risk of metastatic disease increases with tumor volume. In this context, it is useful to assess whether the regular practice of breast self-examination (BSE) has an impact on the number of cancers diagnosed, their stage, the treatments used and mortality. DESIGN: the CNGOF's Commission de Sénologie (CS), composed by 17 experts and 3 invited members, drew up these recommendations. No funding was provided for the development of these recommendations. The CS respected and followed the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. METHODS: The CS studied 16 questions concerning BSE, individualizing four groups of women (general population, women aged over 75, high-risk women, and women previously treated for breast cancer). For each situation, it was determined whether the practice of BSE compared with abstention from this examination led to the detection of more breast cancers and/or recurrences and/or reduced treatment and/or increased survival. RESULTS: BSE should not be recommended for women in the general population, who otherwise benefit from a clinical breast examination (by the attending physician or gynecologist) from the age of 25, and from organized screening from 50 to 74 (strong recommendation). However, in the absence of data on the role of BSE in patients aged over 75, those at high risk of breast cancer and those previously treated for breast cancer, the CS was unable to issue recommendations. Thus, if women in these latter categories wish to undergo BSE, they must be given rigorous training in the technique, and information on the benefits and risks observed in the general population. Finally, the CS invites all women who detect a change or abnormality in their breasts to consult a healthcare professional without delay. CONCLUSION: BSE is not recommended for women in the general population. No recommendation can be established for women aged over 75, those at high risk of breast cancer and those previously treated for breast cancer.

Impact of cervical excisional dimensions on endocervical margins status in adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: A multicenter study from the FRANCOGYN group.

OBJECTIVE: Excisional procedures have a central role in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix (AIS). We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the excisional specimen dimensions and the endocervical margin status. METHODS: We conducted a multicentric retrospective study in seven French centers. All cases with proven AIS on a colposcopic biopsy and undergoing an excisional procedure afterwards were included in the analysis. We evaluated the impact of excision length, along with the lateral and anteroposterior diameters on the endocervical margin status. An additional subgroup analysis of the impact of maternal age on endocervical margin status was also conducted. RESULTS: Of the 101 cases of AIS diagnosed on initial biopsy, 95 underwent a primary excisional procedure, among which 80% (n = 76/95) had uninvolved endocervical margins and 20% (n = 19/95) had positive endocervical margins. The excisional specimen length was not significantly related to the endocervical margin status. Conversely, both lateral and antero-posterior diameters were significantly correlated with the negative endocervical margins status: OR = 1,19, 95% CI [1.03, 1.40], p = 0.025, for the lateral diameter and OR = 1.34, 95% CI [1.14, 1.64], p = 0.001 for the antero-posterior diameter. The median lateral diameter was 20 mm, IQR (18, 24) in case of endocervical negative margins vs. 18 mm IQR (15, 24) in case of positive endocervical margins (p = 0.039), and the median anteroposterior diameter was 17 mm IQR (15, 20) in case of negative endocervical margins vs 14 mm IQR (11, 15) in case of positive endocervical margins (p = 0.004), respectively.  Additionally, in patients over 45 years old, endocervical margin were more likely to be positive despite similar excisional dimensions (7/17 (41%) of positive endocercival margins before 45 years old vs 12/78 (15%) after, p = 0.039) CONCLUSIONS: Endocervical margin statues were significantly related to the transverse diameters (lateral and anteroposterior diameters), but not to the excision specimen length. Reducing the excised length may lead to fewer post-procedure complications but would still allow to obtain a large proportion of negative endocervical margins.

Adipocytes secretome from normal and tumor breast favor breast cancer invasion by metabolic reprogramming

Background Adipose tissue is a major component of breast stroma. This study focused on delineating the effects of adipose stem cells (ASCs) derived from breast of healthy women and cancer patients with normal or tumor breast cells. Methods The ASCs were induced to differentiate into adipocytes, and the subsequent adipocyte conditioned media (ACM) were evaluated for their fatty acid profile, adipokine secretion and influence on proliferation, migration and invasion on tumoral (MCF-7 and SUM159) and normal (HMEC) human breast cell lines. Results An enrichment of arachidonic acid was observed in ACM from tumor tissues. Adipose tissues from tumor free secrete twice as much leptin than those from proximal or distal to the tumor. All ACMs display proliferative activity and favor invasiveness of SUM159 cells compared to MCF-7 and HMEC. All ACMs induced lipid droplets accumulation in MCF-7 cells and increased CD36 expression in tumor cells. Conclusion We conclude that among secreted factors analyzed, only arachidonic acid and leptin levels did discriminate ASCs from tumor-bearing and tumor-free breasts emphasizing the importance that other cell types could contribute to the adipose tissue secretome in a tumor context (AU)

Adipocytes secretome from normal and tumor breast favor breast cancer invasion by metabolic reprogramming.

BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue is a major component of breast stroma. This study focused on delineating the effects of adipose stem cells (ASCs) derived from breast of healthy women and cancer patients with normal or tumor breast cells. METHODS: The ASCs were induced to differentiate into adipocytes, and the subsequent adipocyte conditioned media (ACM) were evaluated for their fatty acid profile, adipokine secretion and influence on proliferation, migration and invasion on tumoral (MCF-7 and SUM159) and normal (HMEC) human breast cell lines. RESULTS: An enrichment of arachidonic acid was observed in ACM from tumor tissues. Adipose tissues from tumor free secrete twice as much leptin than those from proximal or distal to the tumor. All ACMs display proliferative activity and favor invasiveness of SUM159 cells compared to MCF-7 and HMEC. All ACMs induced lipid droplets accumulation in MCF-7 cells and increased CD36 expression in tumor cells. CONCLUSION: We conclude that among secreted factors analyzed, only arachidonic acid and leptin levels did discriminate ASCs from tumor-bearing and tumor-free breasts emphasizing the importance that other cell types could contribute to the adipose tissue secretome in a tumor context.

[Application in France of the 2021 European recommendations on endometrial cancer]. / Application en France des recommandations européennes 2021 sur le cancer de l'endomètre.

The latest European recommendations of the European Societies of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO), Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and Anatomopathology (ESP) concerning the management of patients with endometrial cancer were published in 2021. On behalf of the French Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SFOG) and the SFOG campus, we wish to summarize for the French-speaking readership the main measures with a more specific application for France. We also incorporate data from a Delphi survey conducted with a panel of French and French-speaking Swiss experts. The data presented in this article relate to histo-molecular characteristics, radiological data of endometrial cancer, and management of low-risk, intermediate-risk, intermediate-high-risk, and metastatic cancers. The aim of this review article is to show the application of the latest international recommendations to clinicians and pathologists for the implementation of these recommendations.

Management of Endometrial Cancer: French Society of Onco-Gynecology's Evaluation through a Delphi Survey.

Our aim was to assess the opinion of a panel of experts and obtain a consensus on the management of endometrial cancer in France and French Switzerland. A Delphi survey was carried out among a panel of French and French-speaking Swiss experts. The first questionnaire included 65 questions divided into eight categories: characterization of experts, histo-molecular characteristics and radiological data of endometrial cancer, and management of low-risk, intermediate-risk, intermediate-high-risk, high-risk, and metastatic cancers. The experts were asked to reply on a 9-point scale, both on the validity and the clarity of each question. After the answers were analyzed, a second questionnaire was sent to the same experts. The study took place between December 2021 and March 2022. Further, 58 (57.4%) of the 101 experts responded in the first round, and 39 recommendations were obtained (60%). Six questions were voted redundant and 20 discordant. These questions were reformulated, and, at the end of the second round, 17 recommendations were validated (85%). In total, the study presents an analysis of 56 questions and related responses. Expert advice helps to clarify non-consensual issues, standardize the management of endometrial cancer, and optimize clinical practices.

The Role of Immunohistochemistry Markers in Endometrial Cancer with Mismatch Repair Deficiency: A Systematic Review.

The objective of this systematic review was to summarize our current knowledge of the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers for identifying mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) tumors in endometrial cancer (EC). Identification of MMRd tumors, which occur in 13% to 30% of all ECs, has become critical for patients with colorectal and endometrial cancer for therapeutic management, clinical decision making, and prognosis. This review was conducted by two authors applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the following terms: "immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability endometrial cancer" or "immunohistochemistry and mismatch repair endometrial cancer" or "immunohistochemistry and mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer". Among 596 retrieved studies, 161 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Articles were classified and presented according to their interest for the diagnosis, prognosis, and theragnostics for patients with MMRd EC. We identified 10, 18, and 96 articles using IHC expression of two, three, or four proteins of the MMR system (MLH1, MSH2, MHS6, and PMS2), respectively. MLH1 promoter methylation was analyzed in 57 articles. Thirty-four articles classified MMRd tumors with IHC markers according to their prognosis in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), stage, grade, and lymph node invasion. Theragnostics were studied in eight articles underlying the important concentration of PD-L1 in MMRd EC. Even though the role of IHC has been challenged, it represents the most common, robust, and cheapest method for diagnosing MMRd tumors in EC and is a valuable tool for exploring novel biotherapies and treatment modalities.

Residual Microscopic Peritoneal Metastases after Macroscopic Complete Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: A Target for Folate Receptor Targeted Photodynamic Therapy?

Despite conventional treatment combining complete macroscopic cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and systemic chemotherapy, residual microscopic peritoneal metastases (mPM) may persist as the cause of peritoneal recurrence in 60% of patients. Therefore, there is a real need to specifically target these mPM to definitively eradicate any traces of the disease and improve patient survival. Therapeutic targeting method, such as photodynamic therapy, would be a promising method for such a purpose. Folate receptor alpha (FRα), as it is specifically overexpressed by cancer cells from various origins, including ovarian cancer cells, is a good target to address photosensitizing molecules. The aim of this study was to determine FRα expression by residual mPM after complete macroscopic CRS in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). A prospective study conducted between 1 June 2018 and 10 July 2019 in a single referent center accredited by the European Society of Gynecological Oncology for advanced EOC surgical management. Consecutive patients presenting with advanced HGSOC and eligible for complete macroscopic CRS were included. Up to 13 peritoneal biopsies were taken from macroscopically healthy peritoneum at the end of CRS and examined for the presence of mPM. In case of detection of mPM, a systematic search for RFα expression by immunohistochemistry was performed. Twenty-six patients were included and 26.9% presented mPM. In the subgroup of patients with mPM, FRα expression was positive on diagnostic biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 67% of patients, on macroscopic peritoneal metastases for 86% of patients, and on mPM for 75% of patients. In the subgroup of patients with no mPM, FRα expression was found on diagnostic biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 29% of patients and on macroscopic peritoneal metastases in 78% of patients. FRα is well expressed by patients with or without mPM after complete macroscopic CRS in patients with advanced HGSOC. In addition to conventional cytoreductive surgery, the use of a therapeutic targeting method, such as photodynamic therapy, by addressing photosensitizing molecules that specifically target FRα may be studied.

[Préservation de la fertilité avant traitement d'un cancer de l'ovaire]. / Fertility preservation before ovarian malignancy treatment.

FERTILITY PRESERVATION BEFORE OVARIAN MALIGNANCY TREATMENT While most ovarian epithelial malignancies affect postmenopausal women, 12% occur in reproductive age patients. In addition, borderline ovarian tumors and rare non epithelial ovarian tumors are diagnosed in young patients as well. The prognosis of early-stage epithelial tumors, non-epithelial and frontier tumors is good. Increased knowledge in this specific field now allows the development of fertility preservation strategies. They include conservative surgery when applicable, associated with oocyte and / or ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Indications remain limited, and any decision must be validated by a multidisciplinary expert committee. The different strategies depend on specific tumoral or genetic context.

PRÉSERVATION DE LA FERTILITÉ AVANT TRAITEMENT D'UN CANCER DE L'OVAIRE Le cancer épithélial de l'ovaire atteint en majorité les patientes ménopausées. Cependant, 12 % des patientes ont moins de 44 ans. Les tumeurs frontières de l'ovaire et les tumeurs rares non épithéliales sont diagnostiquées plus fréquemment chez les femmes en âge de procréer. Le pronostic des stades précoces et des tumeurs non épithéliales est favorable. Les avancées scientifiques permettent de développer des stratégies de préservation de la fertilité, qui reposent d'abord sur la possibilité d'une chirurgie conservatrice et sur la préservation de gamètes ou de tissus germinaux. Les indications restent néanmoins limitées, et toute décision doit être discutée en réunion de concertation pluridisciplinaire (RCP) de recours. Les différentes stratégies dépendent du contexte tumoral ou génétique.